# Flyimg vs openinary

> Two self-hosted [Cloudinary alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/cloudinary), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Flyimg | openinary |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 13 in Image Processing | #78 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 1 233 ✓ | 418 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +6 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 14 |
| Latest release | 1.12.12 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.5.0 · 1 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Flyimg scores 57/100 against 46/100 for openinary, so it is the safer default.

Flyimg ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for openinary.

If you want the quickest setup, Flyimg is easier to run; openinary needs more configuration.

Flyimg is growing faster right now (+6 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Flyimg](https://selfhost.directory/project/flyimg) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/flyimg.md)
- [openinary](https://selfhost.directory/project/openinary) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openinary.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/flyimg-vs-openinary