fluxervsZero-K
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| fluxer | Zero-K | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 110 in Chat | #2 of 23 in Gaming |
| GitHub stars | 10 695 | 877 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +339 | +28 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1038 | 0 |
| Latest release | fluxer-users@2026.1028.183805 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Lua |
Which one should you pick?
fluxer scores 71/100 against 62/100 for Zero-K, so it is the safer default.
fluxer ships more often: 1038 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zero-K.
If you want the quickest setup, Zero-K is easier to run; fluxer needs more configuration.
fluxer is growing faster right now (+339 stars in 30 days).
fluxer details →Zero-K details →
Swap a project
Keep fluxer, compare it with
Keep Zero-K, compare it with