# fluxer vs Stirling-PDF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | fluxer | Stirling-PDF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 110 in Chat | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 10 707 | 95 319 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +340 | +2 357 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1045 ✓ | 25 |
| Latest release | fluxer-users@2026.1028.211245 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 71/100 for fluxer, so it is the safer default.

fluxer ships more often: 1045 stable releases in the past year, against 25 for Stirling-PDF.

If you want the quickest setup, Stirling-PDF is easier to run; fluxer needs more configuration.

Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 357 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [fluxer](https://selfhost.directory/project/fluxer) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fluxer.md)
- [Stirling-PDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fluxer-vs-stirling-pdf