# fluxer vs sdnext

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | fluxer | sdnext |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 110 in Chat | #3 of 11 in Image Generation |
| GitHub stars | 10 705 ✓ | 7 362 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +338 ✓ | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1045 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | fluxer-users@2026.1028.211245 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

fluxer and sdnext score the same (71/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

fluxer ships more often: 1045 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for sdnext.

If you want the quickest setup, sdnext is easier to run; fluxer needs more configuration.

fluxer is growing faster right now (+338 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [fluxer](https://selfhost.directory/project/fluxer) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fluxer.md)
- [sdnext](https://selfhost.directory/project/sdnext) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sdnext.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fluxer-vs-sdnext