# fluxer vs nanobot

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | fluxer | nanobot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 110 in Chat | #8 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 10 698 | 49 586 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +342 | +1 064 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1038 ✓ | 13 |
| Latest release | fluxer-users@2026.1028.211245 · 28 Oct 2026 | v0.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

nanobot scores 82/100 against 71/100 for fluxer, so it is the safer default.

fluxer ships more often: 1038 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for nanobot.

If you want the quickest setup, nanobot is easier to run; fluxer needs more configuration.

nanobot is growing faster right now (+1 064 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [fluxer](https://selfhost.directory/project/fluxer) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fluxer.md)
- [nanobot](https://selfhost.directory/project/nanobot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nanobot.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fluxer-vs-nanobot