fluxervsllama.cpp
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| fluxer | llama.cpp | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 93/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 110 in Chat | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 10 702 | 132 689 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +335 | +3 234 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1045 | 1464 |
| Latest release | fluxer-users@2026.1028.211245 · 28 Oct 2026 | b11978 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | C++ |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 71/100 for fluxer, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1464 stable releases in the past year, against 1045 for fluxer.
If you want the quickest setup, llama.cpp is easier to run; fluxer needs more configuration.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 234 stars in 30 days).
fluxer details →llama.cpp details →
Swap a project
Keep fluxer, compare it with
Keep llama.cpp, compare it with