# fluentd vs InvokeAI

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | fluentd | InvokeAI |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 13 in Log Management | #2 of 11 in Image Generation |
| GitHub stars | 13 612 | 28 911 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 | +625 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 13 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.20.1 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.14.2 · 27 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

InvokeAI scores 82/100 against 74/100 for fluentd, so it is the safer default.

InvokeAI ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for fluentd.

If you want the quickest setup, InvokeAI is easier to run; fluentd needs more configuration.

InvokeAI is growing faster right now (+625 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [fluentd](https://selfhost.directory/project/fluentd) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fluentd.md)
- [InvokeAI](https://selfhost.directory/project/invokeai) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/invokeai.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fluentd-vs-invokeai