# FlowFuse vs Orca

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | FlowFuse | Orca |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 54/100 | 91/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #13 of 17 in Low Code | #1 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 400 | 109 022 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +9 115 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 ✓ | 15 |
| Latest release | v3.2.0 · 22 Oct 2026 | v1.4.243 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Orca scores 91/100 against 54/100 for FlowFuse, so it is the safer default.

FlowFuse ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for Orca.

If you want the quickest setup, Orca is easier to run; FlowFuse needs more configuration.

Orca is growing faster right now (+9 115 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [FlowFuse](https://selfhost.directory/project/flowfuse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/flowfuse.md)
- [Orca](https://selfhost.directory/project/orca) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/orca.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/flowfuse-vs-orca