# FlowFuse vs nocodb

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | FlowFuse | nocodb |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 54/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #13 of 17 in Low Code | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms |
| GitHub stars | 400 | 65 374 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +320 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 ✓ | 15 |
| Latest release | v3.2.0 · 22 Oct 2026 | 2026.10.0 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

nocodb scores 81/100 against 54/100 for FlowFuse, so it is the safer default.

FlowFuse ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for nocodb.

If you want the quickest setup, nocodb is easier to run; FlowFuse needs more configuration.

nocodb is growing faster right now (+320 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [FlowFuse](https://selfhost.directory/project/flowfuse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/flowfuse.md)
- [nocodb](https://selfhost.directory/project/nocodb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nocodb.md)

## Related comparisons

- [directus vs nocodb](https://selfhost.directory/compare/directus-vs-nocodb)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/flowfuse-vs-nocodb