# FlowFuse vs nocobase

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | FlowFuse | nocobase |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 54/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #13 of 17 in Low Code | #2 of 4 in No-code Platforms |
| GitHub stars | 400 | 24 761 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +427 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 75 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.2.0 · 22 Oct 2026 | v2.2.35 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

nocobase scores 78/100 against 54/100 for FlowFuse, so it is the safer default.

nocobase ships more often: 75 stable releases in the past year, against 21 for FlowFuse.

If you want the quickest setup, nocobase is easier to run; FlowFuse needs more configuration.

nocobase is growing faster right now (+427 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [FlowFuse](https://selfhost.directory/project/flowfuse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/flowfuse.md)
- [nocobase](https://selfhost.directory/project/nocobase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nocobase.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/flowfuse-vs-nocobase