# flowctl vs OmniVoice-Studio

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | flowctl | OmniVoice-Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 94/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #20 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 343 | 92 975 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +58 034 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 35 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.15.0 · 7 Sept 2026 | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 47/100 for flowctl, so it is the safer default.

OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for flowctl.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+58 034 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [flowctl](https://selfhost.directory/project/flowctl) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/flowctl.md)
- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/flowctl-vs-omnivoice-studio