# flowctl vs llama.cpp

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | flowctl | llama.cpp |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 93/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #20 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 343 | 132 663 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +3 306 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 1459 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.15.0 · 7 Sept 2026 | b11970 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 47/100 for flowctl, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1459 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for flowctl.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 306 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [flowctl](https://selfhost.directory/project/flowctl) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/flowctl.md)
- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/flowctl-vs-llamacpp