# flowctl vs InvokeAI

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | flowctl | InvokeAI |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #20 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #2 of 11 in Image Generation |
| GitHub stars | 343 | 28 907 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +621 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 13 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.15.0 · 7 Sept 2026 | v6.14.2 · 27 Sept 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

InvokeAI scores 82/100 against 47/100 for flowctl, so it is the safer default.

InvokeAI ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for flowctl.

If you want the quickest setup, InvokeAI is easier to run; flowctl needs more configuration.

InvokeAI is growing faster right now (+621 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [flowctl](https://selfhost.directory/project/flowctl) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/flowctl.md)
- [InvokeAI](https://selfhost.directory/project/invokeai) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/invokeai.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/flowctl-vs-invokeai