# flowbaker vs llama.cpp

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | flowbaker | llama.cpp |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 42/100 | 93/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #25 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 205 | 132 679 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +3 322 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1462 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | b11976 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 42/100 for flowbaker, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1462 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for flowbaker.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 322 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [flowbaker](https://selfhost.directory/project/flowbaker) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/flowbaker.md)
- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/flowbaker-vs-llamacpp