# flowbaker vs InvokeAI

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | flowbaker | InvokeAI |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 42/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #25 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #2 of 11 in Image Generation |
| GitHub stars | 205 | 28 910 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +624 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 13 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v6.14.2 · 27 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

InvokeAI scores 82/100 against 42/100 for flowbaker, so it is the safer default.

InvokeAI ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for flowbaker.

If you want the quickest setup, InvokeAI is easier to run; flowbaker needs more configuration.

InvokeAI is growing faster right now (+624 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [flowbaker](https://selfhost.directory/project/flowbaker) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/flowbaker.md)
- [InvokeAI](https://selfhost.directory/project/invokeai) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/invokeai.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/flowbaker-vs-invokeai