# flow-like vs WOML

> Two self-hosted [n8n alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/n8n), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | flow-like | WOML |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #17 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #21 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 968 ✓ | 156 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +11 | +25 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 4 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.1.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Rust | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

flow-like scores 50/100 against 46/100 for WOML, so it is the safer default.

WOML ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for flow-like.

If you want the quickest setup, WOML is easier to run; flow-like needs more configuration.

WOML is growing faster right now (+25 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [flow-like](https://selfhost.directory/project/flow-like) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/flow-like.md)
- [WOML](https://selfhost.directory/project/woml) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/woml.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/flow-like-vs-woml