# flow-like vs hatchet

> Two self-hosted [Temporal alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/temporal), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | flow-like | hatchet |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 72/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #17 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #8 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 967 | 8 195 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +10 | +203 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 20 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | py/1.43.2 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

hatchet scores 72/100 against 50/100 for flow-like, so it is the safer default.

hatchet ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for flow-like.

If you want the quickest setup, hatchet is easier to run; flow-like needs more configuration.

hatchet is growing faster right now (+203 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [flow-like](https://selfhost.directory/project/flow-like) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/flow-like.md)
- [hatchet](https://selfhost.directory/project/hatchet) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hatchet.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/flow-like-vs-hatchet