FloodvsSRS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Flood | SRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 7 in Torrent | #4 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 2 860 | 29 391 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +17 | +112 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 13 |
| Latest release | v4.16.3 · 17 Oct 2026 | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | C |
Which one should you pick?
SRS scores 78/100 against 65/100 for Flood, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Flood is easier to run; SRS needs more configuration.
SRS is growing faster right now (+112 stars in 30 days).
Swap a project
Keep Flood, compare it with
Keep SRS, compare it with