# Flood vs Reactive Resume

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Flood | Reactive Resume |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 7 in Torrent | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 860 | 45 045 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +17 | +1 644 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 35 ✓ |
| Latest release | v4.16.3 · 17 Oct 2026 | v6.0.8 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 65/100 for Flood, so it is the safer default.

Reactive Resume ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for Flood.

If you want the quickest setup, Flood is easier to run; Reactive Resume needs more configuration.

Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 644 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Flood](https://selfhost.directory/project/flood) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/flood.md)
- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/flood-vs-reactive-resume