# Flood vs paperclip

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Flood | paperclip |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 7 in Torrent | #4 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 2 860 | 108 263 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +17 | +26 899 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v4.16.3 · 17 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2026.1012.0 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

paperclip scores 88/100 against 65/100 for Flood, so it is the safer default.

Flood ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for paperclip.

If you want the quickest setup, Flood is easier to run; paperclip needs more configuration.

paperclip is growing faster right now (+26 899 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Flood](https://selfhost.directory/project/flood) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/flood.md)
- [paperclip](https://selfhost.directory/project/paperclip) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/paperclip.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/flood-vs-paperclip