Floodvspaperclip
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Flood | paperclip | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 7 in Torrent | #4 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 2 860 | 108 263 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +17 | +26 899 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 10 |
| Latest release | v4.16.3 · 17 Oct 2026 | v2026.1012.0 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
paperclip scores 88/100 against 65/100 for Flood, so it is the safer default.
Flood ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for paperclip.
If you want the quickest setup, Flood is easier to run; paperclip needs more configuration.
paperclip is growing faster right now (+26 899 stars in 30 days).
Flood details →paperclip details →
Swap a project
Keep Flood, compare it with
Keep paperclip, compare it with