# Flipt vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Flipt | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 8 in Feature Flags | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 4 931 ✓ | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +20 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.62.0 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

Flipt scores 66/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

Flipt ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.

If you want the quickest setup, Flipt is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

Flipt is growing faster right now (+20 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Flipt](https://selfhost.directory/project/flipt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/flipt.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/flipt-vs-windows-arm