# Flipt vs OmniVoice-Studio

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Flipt | OmniVoice-Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 94/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 8 in Feature Flags | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 4 932 | 94 124 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 | +58 850 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 35 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.62.0 · 23 Oct 2026 | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 66/100 for Flipt, so it is the safer default.

OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for Flipt.

If you want the quickest setup, Flipt is easier to run; OmniVoice-Studio needs more configuration.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+58 850 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Flipt](https://selfhost.directory/project/flipt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/flipt.md)
- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/flipt-vs-omnivoice-studio