# Flipt vs Octoprint

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Flipt | Octoprint |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 8 in Feature Flags | #1 of 22 in 3D Printing |
| GitHub stars | 4 930 | 9 167 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 | +59 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v1.62.0 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | 1.11.8 · 23 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Octoprint scores 73/100 against 66/100 for Flipt, so it is the safer default.

Flipt ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Octoprint.

If you want the quickest setup, Flipt is easier to run; Octoprint needs more configuration.

Octoprint is growing faster right now (+59 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Flipt](https://selfhost.directory/project/flipt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/flipt.md)
- [Octoprint](https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/flipt-vs-octoprint