# Flipt vs hass-configurator

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Flipt | hass-configurator |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 ✓ | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 8 in Feature Flags | #6 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 4 930 ✓ | 339 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v1.62.0 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | 0.7.0 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Flipt scores 66/100 against 50/100 for hass-configurator, so it is the safer default.

Flipt ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for hass-configurator.

If you want the quickest setup, Flipt is easier to run; hass-configurator needs more configuration.

Flipt is growing faster right now (+21 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Flipt](https://selfhost.directory/project/flipt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/flipt.md)
- [hass-configurator](https://selfhost.directory/project/hass-configurator) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hass-configurator.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/flipt-vs-hass-configurator