# flight-finder vs TREK

> Two self-hosted [Travel projects](https://selfhost.directory/travel), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | flight-finder | TREK |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 8 in Travel | #1 of 8 in Travel |
| GitHub stars | 177 | 15 187 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +880 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 28 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.16.0 · 15 Oct 2026 | v5.0.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

TREK scores 76/100 against 46/100 for flight-finder, so it is the safer default.

TREK ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for flight-finder.

If you want the quickest setup, TREK is easier to run; flight-finder needs more configuration.

TREK is growing faster right now (+880 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [flight-finder](https://selfhost.directory/project/flight-finder) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/flight-finder.md)
- [TREK](https://selfhost.directory/project/trek) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trek.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/flight-finder-vs-trek