# FlexGet vs monitorss-bot

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | FlexGet | monitorss-bot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 ✓ | 58/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 26 in Automation | #2 of 4 in RSS |
| GitHub stars | 1 988 ✓ | 1 296 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +16 ✓ | +11 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 47 ✓ | 7 |
| Latest release | v3.22.9 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v7.5.0 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

FlexGet scores 62/100 against 58/100 for monitorss-bot, so it is the safer default.

FlexGet ships more often: 47 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for monitorss-bot.

If you want the quickest setup, FlexGet is easier to run; monitorss-bot needs more configuration.

## Details

- [FlexGet](https://selfhost.directory/project/flexget) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/flexget.md)
- [monitorss-bot](https://selfhost.directory/project/monitorss-bot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/monitorss-bot.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/flexget-vs-monitorss-bot