# fleetbase vs Workout.cool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | fleetbase | Workout.cool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 ✓ | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | — | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 4 416 | 8 650 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +530 ✓ | +155 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 39 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v0.7.74 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

fleetbase scores 67/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.

fleetbase ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.

If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; fleetbase needs more configuration.

fleetbase is growing faster right now (+530 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [fleetbase](https://selfhost.directory/project/fleetbase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fleetbase.md)
- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fleetbase-vs-workout-cool