fleetbasevsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| fleetbase | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | — | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 4 416 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +530 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 39 | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.7.74 · 27 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
fleetbase scores 67/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
fleetbase ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.
If you want the quickest setup, fleetbase is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
fleetbase is growing faster right now (+530 stars in 30 days).