# Fleet vs Octoprint

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Fleet | Octoprint |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Device Management | #1 of 22 in 3D Printing |
| GitHub stars | 7 065 | 9 167 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +59 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 5 ✓ |
| Latest release | fleet-v4.93.2 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | 1.11.8 · 23 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Octoprint scores 73/100 against 67/100 for Fleet, so it is the safer default.

Octoprint ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Fleet.

If you want the quickest setup, Octoprint is easier to run; Fleet needs more configuration.

Octoprint is growing faster right now (+59 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Fleet](https://selfhost.directory/project/fleet) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fleet.md)
- [Octoprint](https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fleet-vs-octoprint