# Fish Speech vs ZPan

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Fish Speech | ZPan |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #8 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 33 475 ✓ | 2 080 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +152 ✓ | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2.9.0 · 30 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 56/100 for ZPan, so it is the safer default.

ZPan ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.

If you want the quickest setup, ZPan is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.

Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+152 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Fish Speech](https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech.md)
- [ZPan](https://selfhost.directory/project/zpan) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zpan.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fish-speech-vs-zpan