Fish Speechvswyoming-piper
Two self-hosted Text to Speech projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | wyoming-piper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #7 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 33 454 | 218 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +131 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 15 |
| Latest release | — | v2.5.2 · 11 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 52/100 for wyoming-piper, so it is the safer default.
wyoming-piper ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
If you want the quickest setup, wyoming-piper is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+131 stars in 30 days).
Fish Speech details →wyoming-piper details →All Text to Speech projects →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep wyoming-piper, compare it with