# Fish Speech vs wyoming-openwakeword

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Fish Speech | wyoming-openwakeword |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #7 of 11 in Voice Assistants |
| GitHub stars | 33 457 ✓ | 207 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +134 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2.1.0 · 30 Oct 2025 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 45/100 for wyoming-openwakeword, so it is the safer default.

wyoming-openwakeword ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.

If you want the quickest setup, wyoming-openwakeword is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.

Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+134 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Fish Speech](https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech.md)
- [wyoming-openwakeword](https://selfhost.directory/project/wyoming-openwakeword) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wyoming-openwakeword.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fish-speech-vs-wyoming-openwakeword