# Fish Speech vs Web Rendering Proxy (WRP)

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Fish Speech | Web Rendering Proxy (WRP) |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #11 of 25 in Proxy |
| GitHub stars | 33 457 ✓ | 1 306 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +134 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 4 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 4.10.3 · 23 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 53/100 for Web Rendering Proxy (WRP), so it is the safer default.

Web Rendering Proxy (WRP) ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.

If you want the quickest setup, Web Rendering Proxy (WRP) is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.

Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+134 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Fish Speech](https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech.md)
- [Web Rendering Proxy (WRP)](https://selfhost.directory/project/wrp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wrp.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fish-speech-vs-wrp