Fish SpeechvsWeb Rendering Proxy (WRP)
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | Web Rendering Proxy (WRP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #11 of 25 in Proxy |
| GitHub stars | 33 455 | 1 306 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +132 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 4 |
| Latest release | — | 4.10.3 · 23 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 53/100 for Web Rendering Proxy (WRP), so it is the safer default.
Web Rendering Proxy (WRP) ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
If you want the quickest setup, Web Rendering Proxy (WRP) is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+132 stars in 30 days).
Fish Speech details →Web Rendering Proxy (WRP) details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep Web Rendering Proxy (WRP), compare it with