Fish Speechvsworklenz
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | worklenz | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #12 of 45 in Project Management |
| GitHub stars | 33 462 | 3 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +139 | +102 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 8 |
| Latest release | — | v3.3.1 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 63/100 for worklenz, so it is the safer default.
worklenz ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
If you want the quickest setup, worklenz is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
Fish Speech details →worklenz details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep worklenz, compare it with