# Fish Speech vs WeTTY

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Fish Speech | WeTTY |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #7 of 23 in Remote Access |
| GitHub stars | 33 469 ✓ | 5 478 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +146 ✓ | +29 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 20 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v4.2.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 68/100 for WeTTY, so it is the safer default.

WeTTY ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.

If you want the quickest setup, WeTTY is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.

Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+146 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Fish Speech](https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech.md)
- [WeTTY](https://selfhost.directory/project/wetty) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wetty.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fish-speech-vs-wetty