# Fish Speech vs Warpgate

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Fish Speech | Warpgate |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 75/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #11 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 33 452 ✓ | 8 159 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +129 | +199 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 33 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.30.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Warpgate scores 75/100 against 73/100 for Fish Speech, so it is the safer default.

Warpgate ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.

If you want the quickest setup, Warpgate is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Fish Speech](https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech.md)
- [Warpgate](https://selfhost.directory/project/warpgate) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/warpgate.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fish-speech-vs-warpgate