# Fish Speech vs voidaccess

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Fish Speech | voidaccess |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #28 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 33 454 ✓ | 949 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +131 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 18 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2.1.0 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 57/100 for voidaccess, so it is the safer default.

voidaccess ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.

Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+131 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Fish Speech](https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech.md)
- [voidaccess](https://selfhost.directory/project/voidaccess) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/voidaccess.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fish-speech-vs-voidaccess