# Fish Speech vs 墨台 · VibeHolding

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Fish Speech | 墨台 · VibeHolding |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #24 of 42 in Knowledge Management |
| GitHub stars | 33 462 ✓ | 186 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +139 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 45/100 for 墨台 · VibeHolding, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, 墨台 · VibeHolding is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.

Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+139 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Fish Speech](https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech.md)
- [墨台 · VibeHolding](https://selfhost.directory/project/vibe-holding) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/vibe-holding.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fish-speech-vs-vibe-holding