# Fish Speech vs UUSEC WAF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Fish Speech | UUSEC WAF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 33 454 ✓ | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +131 ✓ | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Python | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.

UUSEC WAF ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.

If you want the quickest setup, UUSEC WAF is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.

Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+131 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Fish Speech](https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech.md)
- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fish-speech-vs-uusec-waf