# Fish Speech vs unraid-config-guardian

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Fish Speech | unraid-config-guardian |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #38 of 46 in Backup |
| GitHub stars | 33 469 ✓ | 171 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +146 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 8 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.6.1 · 16 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 46/100 for unraid-config-guardian, so it is the safer default.

unraid-config-guardian ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.

If you want the quickest setup, unraid-config-guardian is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.

Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+146 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Fish Speech](https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech.md)
- [unraid-config-guardian](https://selfhost.directory/project/unraid-config-guardian) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unraid-config-guardian.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fish-speech-vs-unraid-config-guardian