Fish Speechvsunraid-config-guardian
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | unraid-config-guardian | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #38 of 46 in Backup |
| GitHub stars | 33 469 | 171 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +146 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 8 |
| Latest release | — | v1.6.1 · 16 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 46/100 for unraid-config-guardian, so it is the safer default.
unraid-config-guardian ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
If you want the quickest setup, unraid-config-guardian is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+146 stars in 30 days).
Fish Speech details →unraid-config-guardian details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep unraid-config-guardian, compare it with