# Fish Speech vs uMap

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Fish Speech | uMap |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #3 of 9 in Mapping & GPS |
| GitHub stars | 33 450 ✓ | 1 628 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +127 ✓ | +25 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 3.8.1 · 19 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 64/100 for uMap, so it is the safer default.

uMap ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.

If you want the quickest setup, uMap is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.

Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+127 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Fish Speech](https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech.md)
- [uMap](https://selfhost.directory/project/umap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fish-speech-vs-umap