Fish SpeechvsTRAWL
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | TRAWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #11 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | 33 452 | 1 080 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +129 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 |
| Latest release | — | v1.9.3 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 56/100 for TRAWL, so it is the safer default.
TRAWL ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
If you want the quickest setup, TRAWL is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+129 stars in 30 days).
Fish Speech details →TRAWL details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep TRAWL, compare it with