# Fish Speech vs ThoughtDAG

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Fish Speech | ThoughtDAG |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #25 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 33 469 ✓ | 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +146 ✓ | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.5.26 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 51/100 for ThoughtDAG, so it is the safer default.

ThoughtDAG ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.

If you want the quickest setup, ThoughtDAG is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.

Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+146 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Fish Speech](https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech.md)
- [ThoughtDAG](https://selfhost.directory/project/thoughtdag) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/thoughtdag.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fish-speech-vs-thoughtdag