Fish Speechvssuper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | super | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #15 of 34 in Network Management |
| GitHub stars | 33 462 | 875 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +139 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 26 |
| Latest release | — | rpios-v1.2.18 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 53/100 for super, so it is the safer default.
super ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
If you want the quickest setup, super is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+139 stars in 30 days).
Fish Speech details →super details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep super, compare it with