Fish Speechvssupabase-automated-self-host
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | supabase-automated-self-host | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #13 of 15 in Backend as a Service |
| GitHub stars | 33 452 | 506 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +129 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 48/100 for supabase-automated-self-host, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, supabase-automated-self-host is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+129 stars in 30 days).
Fish Speech details →supabase-automated-self-host details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep supabase-automated-self-host, compare it with