# Fish Speech vs statusnook

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Fish Speech | statusnook |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #58 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 33 461 ✓ | 988 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +138 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 51/100 for statusnook, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, statusnook is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.

Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+138 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Fish Speech](https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech.md)
- [statusnook](https://selfhost.directory/project/statusnook) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/statusnook.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fish-speech-vs-statusnook