# Fish Speech vs Standard Notes

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Fish Speech | Standard Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #8 of 81 in Notes & Editors |
| GitHub stars | 33 461 ✓ | 6 686 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +138 ✓ | +53 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 5 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | @standardnotes/mobile@3.202.11 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 70/100 for Standard Notes, so it is the safer default.

Standard Notes ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.

Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+138 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Fish Speech](https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech.md)
- [Standard Notes](https://selfhost.directory/project/standard-notes) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/standard-notes.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fish-speech-vs-standard-notes